Skip to main content
This site is operated on behalf of mots Tercüme by Hacettepe Tercüme Ltd. Şti.
Legalisation chain | Last updated: 29 June 2026
Legalisation chain Legalisation

Tracking and status updates

Tracking which stage the chain is at and reporting regularly to the client.

The legalisation chain is a procedure that takes days and involves more than one organisation. During this time the client cannot see where the file is. Tracking and status updates remove this invisibility and deliver their greatest benefit in giving early notice of delays.

Purpose of tracking

The purpose is to know at every moment which stage the file is at. Information produces decisions. Monitoring is continuous.

Defining the stages

Each step of the chain is defined as a separate stage. An undefined stage cannot be tracked. The structure is set up at the outset.

Stage record

Each step is put on record when it is completed. The record bears a date. The update is made on the spot.

Tracking at document level

In multi-document files each document is tracked separately. Tracking at file level falls short. Detail is needed.

Visibility of a delayed document

A document stuck at a stage stands out in the list. Early visibility makes intervention possible. The function is valuable.

Person responsible

The person responsible for each stage is defined. Unclear responsibility produces delay. The assignment is made.

Frequency of updates

The client is given information at regular intervals. The frequency is agreed at the start of the job. Expectations are aligned.

Informing without being asked

Information is given without the client asking. Waiting to be asked creates anxiety. The approach is preventive.

Content of the update

Which document is at which stage and the next step are written down. A general statement conveys no information. The content is specific.

Estimated date

The estimated time for the remaining steps is shared. The estimate is given realistically. Over-optimism damages trust.

Reporting the risk of delay

The risk is reported the moment it arises. Giving notice on the last day leaves no options. Notice is given early.

Presenting the options

In the event of delay the alternatives are presented along with it. Reporting the problem alone is not enough. A solution is proposed.

Channel

The channel for updates is determined at the outset. Scattered channels cause loss of information. The structure becomes simpler.

A single contact person

There is a single contact person on the client's side. Reporting to many people creates confusion. The channel is reduced to one.

Keeping the records

Correspondence is kept in the file. If a question arises later, the record is the basis. An archive is kept.

Delivery notice

When the job is complete, the steps that were carried out are summarised. The summary closes the file. The document is shared.

Suggested next step

If there is anything the client needs to do, it is stated clearly. A step left unclear gets delayed. The guidance is clear.

Internal reporting

The time spent at each stage is measured and bottlenecks become visible. Measurement improves the process. Data is accumulated.

Its value in the corporate relationship

Clients are usually bothered less by the delay itself than by not being told about it; regular updates make it possible to get through the same period with far less tension. For this reason an update is not a courtesy but a process step. The practice is mandatory.

The costliest mistake

At this step the costliest mistake is not reporting a delay until the last day; the client loses the opportunity to consider alternatives that would rescue their own schedule, and the problem turns into a one-sided fault. The risk is shared when it arises. The decision is taken together.

Translation services

mots Tercüme does this work

mots Tercüme provides written translation to organisations: sworn and notarised translation, technical, legal and financial translation, website and software translation.